演化經(jīng)濟學分析框架的構(gòu)建.rar
演化經(jīng)濟學分析框架的構(gòu)建,1.7萬字 26頁包括論文，開題報告，任務(wù)書，文獻綜述 摘要自從《國富論》出版后，經(jīng)濟學確立了獨立的理論系統(tǒng)，成為一門獨立的學科，經(jīng)過多次的經(jīng)濟學革命后，新古典經(jīng)濟學得以形成和發(fā)展并確立了其了現(xiàn)今的學科地位，這一學科以“理性經(jīng)濟人”為理論假設(shè)基礎(chǔ)，學科內(nèi)部充斥著嚴重的數(shù)理化思想，導致現(xiàn)今經(jīng)濟學嚴...
該文檔為壓縮文件,包含的文件列表如下:
內(nèi)容介紹
原文檔由會員 abababab 發(fā)布
演化經(jīng)濟學分析框架的構(gòu)建
1.7萬字 26頁
包括論文，開題報告，任務(wù)書，文獻綜述
摘 要
自從《國富論》出版后，經(jīng)濟學確立了獨立的理論系統(tǒng)，成為一門獨立的學科，經(jīng)過多次的經(jīng)濟學革命后，新古典經(jīng)濟學得以形成和發(fā)展并確立了其了現(xiàn)今的學科地位，這一學科以“理性經(jīng)濟人”為理論假設(shè)基礎(chǔ)，學科內(nèi)部充斥著嚴重的數(shù)理化思想，導致現(xiàn)今經(jīng)濟學嚴重的脫離了現(xiàn)實社會，所以目前的經(jīng)濟學科遭受到不間斷的學科內(nèi)和學科之外的批判。由此，作為一門社會科學，經(jīng)過部分經(jīng)濟學家的突破，導致了多個經(jīng)濟學分支的確立成型，在本文中筆者經(jīng)過對現(xiàn)今經(jīng)濟學的批判，進而就其中之一的演化經(jīng)濟學分支進行探討，試圖建立起演化經(jīng)濟學的分析框架和對這一學科發(fā)展的指導意義進行論述。
本文筆者從對經(jīng)濟現(xiàn)今發(fā)展趨勢的批判，進而轉(zhuǎn)入對演化經(jīng)濟學分析框架支點的逐一構(gòu)建與深入分析，從經(jīng)濟學最為本質(zhì)的屬性—社會屬性開始，筆者進而批判了現(xiàn)今經(jīng)濟學的工具主義與力學主義，緊接著，筆者引入演化經(jīng)濟學這一經(jīng)濟學分支，從經(jīng)濟的演化動力（生存與發(fā)展）開始入手，分析經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的動力來源，也就是為了生存而發(fā)展，發(fā)展為了生命體的存續(xù)，同時本文中筆者分析了這演化經(jīng)濟學所存在的爭議，也就是達爾文主義與拉馬克主義的取舍。最終引入經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的幾個進程結(jié)點，包括試錯、創(chuàng)新、選擇，而后對這一分支科學的方向性與研究落腳點進行總結(jié)與歸納。
關(guān)鍵詞：經(jīng)濟學，社會科學，演化經(jīng)濟學，分析框架
Economics being a social sciences and the establishment of analytical framework of Evolutionary Economics
Abstract
Since the " The Wealth of Nations" was published, economics was able to establish an independent theoretical construct, and become an independent discipline. After a series of economic revolution, Neo-classical economics established the status of itselsf of the present. Have Homo Oeconomicus as the basis of theoretical assumptions,and full of serious mathematic and physical ideas inside Neo-classical economics that lead to a serious detached from real life. Therefore, the current Neo-classical economics exposed to continuous criticism both within and outside the discipline. Thus, as a social science, a breakthrough come after some economists’s hard work. All this happened result in the establishment of several branches of economics. In this article, the author try to discuss the Evolutionary Economics after the criticism of Neo-classical economics. further, the author trying to establish the analytical framework of Evolutionary Economics and discusse the significance of the analytical framework of Evolutionary Economics.
From Criticism of the present development of Economics, In this article,the Author trying to creat the fulcrum of Evolutionary Economics, and he is trying to do some In-depth analysis after The most essential attribute of Economics—Vergesellschaftung. Then,he tell us why Mathematical instrumentalism and Mechanics Doctrine demand criticism. in the coming part,he begin to talk about the Source of the devolopmet of Economics(exist and Development). Over the next few pages, he is going to analyse the controversy between Darwinism and Lamarckism.in the last part, he trying to summarize the result of the article.
Key words: economics, social sciences, Evolutionary Economics, analysis framework
目 錄
摘 要 I
Abstract II
二、對新古典經(jīng)濟學的批判 1
（一）經(jīng)濟學是一門社會科學 1
（二）對經(jīng)濟學基礎(chǔ)假設(shè)脫離現(xiàn)實的批判 3
（三）經(jīng)濟學數(shù)學工具主義與經(jīng)濟力學 5
三、貼近現(xiàn)實的演化經(jīng)濟學 6
（一）演化動力:生存（survive/ exist）、發(fā)展（develop） 6
（二） 拉馬克主義與達爾文主義 7
（三）試錯、創(chuàng)新、選擇 7
（四）演化經(jīng)濟學演化方向性、研究落腳點的探討 9
四、演化經(jīng)濟學分析框架的構(gòu)建 11
結(jié) 論 17
參考文獻 18
謝 辭 19
參考文獻
[1]宋勝洲.基于知識的演化經(jīng)濟學.上海世紀出版集團.2008.1-80
[2]庫爾特•多普菲，賈根良主譯.演化經(jīng)濟綱領(lǐng)與范圍.高等教育出版社.2004.
[3]約翰•福斯特,賈根良主譯.演化經(jīng)濟學前沿競爭、自組織與創(chuàng)新政策.2005.
[4]道格拉斯•諾思,鐘正生主譯.理解經(jīng)濟變遷過程.中國人民大學出版社.2008.1-100
[5]戴天宇.經(jīng)濟學:范式革命. 清華大學出版社 .2008.1-80
[6]譚偉東.超現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟學,清華大學出版社.2007.1-83
[7]阿爾弗里德•馬歇爾,張桂玲, 黃道平編譯.經(jīng)濟學原理.國商業(yè)出版社 .2009.
[8]陳勁 主編. 演化與創(chuàng)新經(jīng)濟學評論. 科學出版社 .2009.20-30
[9]汪丁丁,葉航.理性的追問:關(guān)于經(jīng)濟學理性主義的對話.廣西師范大學出版社.2003.
[10]薛求知,黃佩燕,魯直.行為經(jīng)濟學:理論與擴展.復旦大學出版社.2003.1-163
[11]靳濤.關(guān)于演化經(jīng)濟學思想的比較:凡勃倫、熊彼特、哈耶克，經(jīng)濟科學，2002，（4）[12]黃凱南，演化博弈與演化經(jīng)濟學，經(jīng)濟研究，2009，（2）.122-128
[13]楊虎濤.演化經(jīng)濟學的過去、現(xiàn)在和將來，學術(shù)建設(shè)，2006（4）.71-80
[14]楊虎濤.演化經(jīng)濟學中的生物學隱喻_合理性_相似性與差異性，學術(shù)月刊2006（38）.89-94
[15]章華.演化均衡與制度演化，浙江社會科學，2004（3）.85-90
[16]董志強.制度及其演化的一般理論，管理世界，2008（5）.151-165
[17]張軍，朱方明，陳健生.從“經(jīng)濟人”到“知識人”:解讀人性假設(shè)的歷史變遷與經(jīng)濟學研究范式的重構(gòu)，經(jīng)濟評論，2004（4）.36-42
[18]馬艷.基于馬克思經(jīng)濟學邏輯的相對理性經(jīng)濟人假設(shè)，當代經(jīng)濟學研究，2007（10）.23-28
[19]王宵前.對“理性經(jīng)濟人”假說的幾點質(zhì)疑，江蘇教育學院學報，2006，（6）.71-73
[20] Veblen. “Why is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?”, Reprinted in The Place of Science in Modern Civilisation, New York: Russell &Russell,1898.56-81
[21] Witt, Ulrich.“Heuristic Twists and Ontological Creeds———A Road Map for Evolutionary Economics”, Papers on Economics and Evolution, Jena: Max Planck Institute of Economics,2007. #0701
[22]Witt, Ulrich. “Evolutionary Economics”, Papers on Economics and Evolution, Jena: Max Planck Institute of Economics,2006. #0605
1.7萬字 26頁
包括論文，開題報告，任務(wù)書，文獻綜述
摘 要
自從《國富論》出版后，經(jīng)濟學確立了獨立的理論系統(tǒng)，成為一門獨立的學科，經(jīng)過多次的經(jīng)濟學革命后，新古典經(jīng)濟學得以形成和發(fā)展并確立了其了現(xiàn)今的學科地位，這一學科以“理性經(jīng)濟人”為理論假設(shè)基礎(chǔ)，學科內(nèi)部充斥著嚴重的數(shù)理化思想，導致現(xiàn)今經(jīng)濟學嚴重的脫離了現(xiàn)實社會，所以目前的經(jīng)濟學科遭受到不間斷的學科內(nèi)和學科之外的批判。由此，作為一門社會科學，經(jīng)過部分經(jīng)濟學家的突破，導致了多個經(jīng)濟學分支的確立成型，在本文中筆者經(jīng)過對現(xiàn)今經(jīng)濟學的批判，進而就其中之一的演化經(jīng)濟學分支進行探討，試圖建立起演化經(jīng)濟學的分析框架和對這一學科發(fā)展的指導意義進行論述。
本文筆者從對經(jīng)濟現(xiàn)今發(fā)展趨勢的批判，進而轉(zhuǎn)入對演化經(jīng)濟學分析框架支點的逐一構(gòu)建與深入分析，從經(jīng)濟學最為本質(zhì)的屬性—社會屬性開始，筆者進而批判了現(xiàn)今經(jīng)濟學的工具主義與力學主義，緊接著，筆者引入演化經(jīng)濟學這一經(jīng)濟學分支，從經(jīng)濟的演化動力（生存與發(fā)展）開始入手，分析經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的動力來源，也就是為了生存而發(fā)展，發(fā)展為了生命體的存續(xù)，同時本文中筆者分析了這演化經(jīng)濟學所存在的爭議，也就是達爾文主義與拉馬克主義的取舍。最終引入經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的幾個進程結(jié)點，包括試錯、創(chuàng)新、選擇，而后對這一分支科學的方向性與研究落腳點進行總結(jié)與歸納。
關(guān)鍵詞：經(jīng)濟學，社會科學，演化經(jīng)濟學，分析框架
Economics being a social sciences and the establishment of analytical framework of Evolutionary Economics
Abstract
Since the " The Wealth of Nations" was published, economics was able to establish an independent theoretical construct, and become an independent discipline. After a series of economic revolution, Neo-classical economics established the status of itselsf of the present. Have Homo Oeconomicus as the basis of theoretical assumptions,and full of serious mathematic and physical ideas inside Neo-classical economics that lead to a serious detached from real life. Therefore, the current Neo-classical economics exposed to continuous criticism both within and outside the discipline. Thus, as a social science, a breakthrough come after some economists’s hard work. All this happened result in the establishment of several branches of economics. In this article, the author try to discuss the Evolutionary Economics after the criticism of Neo-classical economics. further, the author trying to establish the analytical framework of Evolutionary Economics and discusse the significance of the analytical framework of Evolutionary Economics.
From Criticism of the present development of Economics, In this article,the Author trying to creat the fulcrum of Evolutionary Economics, and he is trying to do some In-depth analysis after The most essential attribute of Economics—Vergesellschaftung. Then,he tell us why Mathematical instrumentalism and Mechanics Doctrine demand criticism. in the coming part,he begin to talk about the Source of the devolopmet of Economics(exist and Development). Over the next few pages, he is going to analyse the controversy between Darwinism and Lamarckism.in the last part, he trying to summarize the result of the article.
Key words: economics, social sciences, Evolutionary Economics, analysis framework
目 錄
摘 要 I
Abstract II
二、對新古典經(jīng)濟學的批判 1
（一）經(jīng)濟學是一門社會科學 1
（二）對經(jīng)濟學基礎(chǔ)假設(shè)脫離現(xiàn)實的批判 3
（三）經(jīng)濟學數(shù)學工具主義與經(jīng)濟力學 5
三、貼近現(xiàn)實的演化經(jīng)濟學 6
（一）演化動力:生存（survive/ exist）、發(fā)展（develop） 6
（二） 拉馬克主義與達爾文主義 7
（三）試錯、創(chuàng)新、選擇 7
（四）演化經(jīng)濟學演化方向性、研究落腳點的探討 9
四、演化經(jīng)濟學分析框架的構(gòu)建 11
結(jié) 論 17
參考文獻 18
謝 辭 19
參考文獻
[1]宋勝洲.基于知識的演化經(jīng)濟學.上海世紀出版集團.2008.1-80
[2]庫爾特•多普菲，賈根良主譯.演化經(jīng)濟綱領(lǐng)與范圍.高等教育出版社.2004.
[3]約翰•福斯特,賈根良主譯.演化經(jīng)濟學前沿競爭、自組織與創(chuàng)新政策.2005.
[4]道格拉斯•諾思,鐘正生主譯.理解經(jīng)濟變遷過程.中國人民大學出版社.2008.1-100
[5]戴天宇.經(jīng)濟學:范式革命. 清華大學出版社 .2008.1-80
[6]譚偉東.超現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟學,清華大學出版社.2007.1-83
[7]阿爾弗里德•馬歇爾,張桂玲, 黃道平編譯.經(jīng)濟學原理.國商業(yè)出版社 .2009.
[8]陳勁 主編. 演化與創(chuàng)新經(jīng)濟學評論. 科學出版社 .2009.20-30
[9]汪丁丁,葉航.理性的追問:關(guān)于經(jīng)濟學理性主義的對話.廣西師范大學出版社.2003.
[10]薛求知,黃佩燕,魯直.行為經(jīng)濟學:理論與擴展.復旦大學出版社.2003.1-163
[11]靳濤.關(guān)于演化經(jīng)濟學思想的比較:凡勃倫、熊彼特、哈耶克，經(jīng)濟科學，2002，（4）[12]黃凱南，演化博弈與演化經(jīng)濟學，經(jīng)濟研究，2009，（2）.122-128
[13]楊虎濤.演化經(jīng)濟學的過去、現(xiàn)在和將來，學術(shù)建設(shè)，2006（4）.71-80
[14]楊虎濤.演化經(jīng)濟學中的生物學隱喻_合理性_相似性與差異性，學術(shù)月刊2006（38）.89-94
[15]章華.演化均衡與制度演化，浙江社會科學，2004（3）.85-90
[16]董志強.制度及其演化的一般理論，管理世界，2008（5）.151-165
[17]張軍，朱方明，陳健生.從“經(jīng)濟人”到“知識人”:解讀人性假設(shè)的歷史變遷與經(jīng)濟學研究范式的重構(gòu)，經(jīng)濟評論，2004（4）.36-42
[18]馬艷.基于馬克思經(jīng)濟學邏輯的相對理性經(jīng)濟人假設(shè)，當代經(jīng)濟學研究，2007（10）.23-28
[19]王宵前.對“理性經(jīng)濟人”假說的幾點質(zhì)疑，江蘇教育學院學報，2006，（6）.71-73
[20] Veblen. “Why is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?”, Reprinted in The Place of Science in Modern Civilisation, New York: Russell &Russell,1898.56-81
[21] Witt, Ulrich.“Heuristic Twists and Ontological Creeds———A Road Map for Evolutionary Economics”, Papers on Economics and Evolution, Jena: Max Planck Institute of Economics,2007. #0701
[22]Witt, Ulrich. “Evolutionary Economics”, Papers on Economics and Evolution, Jena: Max Planck Institute of Economics,2006. #0605
