論不純正不作為犯
（專業(yè)：法學(xué)專業(yè)。本畢業(yè)論文共15274字。論述全面。論點(diǎn)獨(dú)特，推薦下載）
目 錄
引言 4
一、公司人格否認(rèn)制度 5
（一）公司人格否認(rèn)制度的含義 5
（二）公司人格否認(rèn)制度的歷史沿革 7
（一）公司人格否認(rèn)制度的法理基礎(chǔ) 9
1.法人的有限責(zé)任的積極價值 9
2．法人有限責(zé)任的內(nèi)在要求 10
3.法益平衡要求的現(xiàn)實破壞與法人格否定 11
（二）公司人格否認(rèn)制度的必要性 13
1．確立公司人格否認(rèn)制度是保護(hù)債權(quán)人利益的需要 13
2.確立公司人格否認(rèn)制度是貫徹法律上公平原則的需要 14
3.確立人格否認(rèn)制度是制止股東濫用公司人格的需要 14
三、公司人格否認(rèn)制度的比較法考察和差異的研究 15
（一）公司人格否認(rèn)制度的比較法考察 15
1. 英美法系國家的公司人格否認(rèn)制度 15
2.大陸法系國家的公司人格否認(rèn)制度 17
(二) 兩大法系公司人格否認(rèn)制度適用的差異 19
結(jié)束語 20
參考文獻(xiàn) 21
內(nèi)容摘要： 隨著商品經(jīng)濟(jì)的飛速發(fā)展，公司開始大規(guī)模的建立并發(fā)展起來，法人以其獨(dú)立的人格及其所賦予的獨(dú)立責(zé)任逐漸成為公司所普遍采取的組織形式，因而獨(dú)立人格成為了公司乃至法人制度的核心，以此為基石構(gòu)建了完整的公司理論，獨(dú)立人格的建構(gòu)反過來又促進(jìn)了商品經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展，然而獨(dú)立人格制度是一柄雙刃劍，一方面它是奮發(fā)進(jìn)取者的保護(hù)傘，另一方面它又是巧詐舞弊者的護(hù)身符，因為一旦股東濫用了公司的獨(dú)立人格，足以掩飾公司背后股東的地位差別，致使債權(quán)人的利益和社會公共利益受到損害，同時也是對社會公平正義的違背，由此一種新的公司制度應(yīng)運(yùn)而生，即公司人格否認(rèn)制度，又稱“揭開公司面紗制度”。
該制度首先在美國等英美法系的國家產(chǎn)生，并經(jīng)過數(shù)十年的發(fā)展為多數(shù)國家所接受，我國也在新修訂的《公司法》中引進(jìn)了該制度，但由于該制度在我國的歷史相對較短，加上我國的法制環(huán)境相對較為落后，所以該制度在我國的運(yùn)行上仍然存在諸多的問題，這篇論文旨在在此背景下通過對該制度的歷史沿革，和國外學(xué)說的比較法研究，探究該制度的法理基礎(chǔ)，制度價值,為該制度在我國的完善提供可行性的建議.


關(guān)鍵詞： 公司人格否認(rèn) 法理基礎(chǔ) 制度價值


Abstract： With the development of economic and society ，corporations were widely built and developed . Corporation with its independent personality and responsibility becoming a commonly adopted company form of organization, Thus independent character to become the company's legal system, as well as the core of this as a cornerstone to build a complete theory of the firm。the construction of independent personality , in turn, promoted the development of marked-oriented economy, however, independent personality system is a double-edged sword, on the one hand， It is the umbrella for those who forge ahead, on the other hand， it is also a clever fraud's talisman, because once shareholders abuse the company's independent personality ,It is enough to cover the differences of shareholders’ status, behind the company, resulting in the creditor's interests and social public interests to be damaged , it is also a breach of social fairness and justice, thus, a new company system came into being, namely, the legal system of denying company personality, also known as "piercing the veil of corporation system" in many states of the ocean legal system
The system first appeared in the United States and other countries of the common legal system accepted it since then, The newly revised "Company Law" of China also introduced the system, but because the system don’t have a relatively long history in our country, coupled with China's legal environment is relatively backward, so there are still many problems when the system is running in our country , This dissertation will introduce systematically the legal system of denying company personality in some important states of ocean legal system and continent legal system , on the basis of analysis in fundamental theoretic problems such as the meanings and characters of denying company personality , and point out the similarities and differences and their basic rules of the legal system of denying company personality in these states by comparison ,then bring forward the systematic thinking and measures on the lays

Key words：denying company personality legal basis value