論經(jīng)營者的安全保障義務(wù)及其責任承擔.doc
約18頁DOC格式手機打開展開
論經(jīng)營者的安全保障義務(wù)及其責任承擔,18頁1.1萬余字目錄摘要ⅡabstractⅢ引言1一 、安全保障義務(wù)的概念及法理基礎(chǔ)2二 、安全保障義務(wù)的法律性質(zhì)2（一）我國相關(guān)立法對經(jīng)營者安全保障義務(wù)的規(guī)定2（二）經(jīng)營者安全保障義務(wù)的性質(zhì)3三、經(jīng)營者承擔安全保障義務(wù)的合理范圍4（一）對經(jīng)營者利益的正視5（二）合理范圍的衡量標準6...
內(nèi)容介紹
此文檔由會員 bshhty 發(fā)布
論經(jīng)營者的安全保障義務(wù)及其責任承擔
18頁1.1萬余字
目錄
摘要 Ⅱ
Abstract Ⅲ
引言 1
一 、安全保障義務(wù)的概念及法理基礎(chǔ) 2
二 、安全保障義務(wù)的法律性質(zhì) 2
（一）我國相關(guān)立法對經(jīng)營者安全保障義務(wù)的規(guī)定 2
（二）經(jīng)營者安全保障義務(wù)的性質(zhì) 3
三、經(jīng)營者承擔安全保障義務(wù)的合理范圍 4
（一）對經(jīng)營者利益的正視 5
（二）合理范圍的衡量標準 6
（三）經(jīng)營者安全保障義務(wù)的內(nèi)容 6
四、經(jīng)營者違反安全保障義務(wù)的責任 7
（一）歸責原則 7
（二）經(jīng)營者具體責任的承擔 8
1. 安全保障義務(wù)的責任類型 8
2. 補充賠償責任的合理性及范圍 8
結(jié) 語 10
參考文獻 11
致 謝 12
摘要
為保護消費者利益而設(shè)立的經(jīng)營者安全保障義務(wù)是一種抽象的危險注意義務(wù)，它來源于德國法官從判例中發(fā)展起來的社會活動安全注意義務(wù)理論，這一義務(wù)是強制性的，是不能約定排除和限制的法定義務(wù)。在司法實踐中審理此類案件時，我們應正視經(jīng)營者的合法利益，兼顧消費者與經(jīng)營者的利益平衡，明確經(jīng)營者對其經(jīng)營行為相關(guān)的危險源能夠合理控制，從法定標準、約定標準及理性人的標準等方面把握經(jīng)營者注意義務(wù)的合理范圍，判斷經(jīng)營者過錯（過失）及過錯大小的標準主要是經(jīng)營者是否違反法定義務(wù)、約定義務(wù)或社會生活的一般注意義務(wù)。違反安全保障義務(wù)的經(jīng)營者責任承擔方式為直接責任或補充責任兩種形式，在第三人積極侵權(quán)時，經(jīng)營者消極不作為對消費者造成損害事實，經(jīng)營者的補充賠償責任總額應小于或等于直接侵權(quán)第三人應當承擔的賠償責任的總額。
關(guān)鍵詞：安全保障義務(wù) 合理范圍 過錯 補充責任
Abstract
The operator safety control duty which sets up for the consumer protection benefit is one kind of abstract dangerous attention duty, it originates from German judge the social activity safe attention duty theory which develops from the legal precedent, this duty is compulsory, cannot agree the legal obligation which removes and limits. Tries this kind of case when the judicial practice, we should face up to operator's legal advantage, gives dual attention to the consumer and operator's benefit balance, is clear about the operator to be able to control reasonably to its management behavior related dangerous source, from official standard, agreement standard and rational person's aspects and so on standard grasps the operator to pay attention to the voluntary the reasonable scope, decided whether the operator does undertake the right infringement responsibility mistake (error) and the mistake size judgment standard is mainly an operator whether to violate the legal obligation, the agreement duty or the social life general attention duty. Violates the safety control duty the operator responsibility to undertake the way for the direct liability or the supplement responsibility two forms, when the third person infringes upon the right positively, the operator does not take negatively to the consumer creates the harm fact, operator's supplement liability o
Key Word Safety control duty ； Reasonable scope ； mistake ；supplement responsibility
參考文獻
[1]麻錦亮，張丹.論安全保障義務(wù)的性質(zhì)[J].社會科學研究，2005，（5）.
[2]張新寶，唐青林.經(jīng)營者對服務(wù)場所的安全保障義務(wù)[J].法學研究，2003，（3）.
[3]楊立新.論違反安全保障義務(wù)侵權(quán)行為及其責任[J].河南省政法管理干部學院學報，2006，（1）.
[4]宋宗宇，冉睿.論經(jīng)營者的安全保障義務(wù)——由“哭泣的上帝和尷尬的仆人”引發(fā)的法律思考[J].上海經(jīng)濟研究，2008，（1）.
[5]張新寶.侵權(quán)責任構(gòu)成要件研究[M].北京：法律出版社，2007.
[6]王澤鑒.民法學說與判例研究第二冊[M].北京：中國政法大學出版社，
18頁1.1萬余字
目錄
摘要 Ⅱ
Abstract Ⅲ
引言 1
一 、安全保障義務(wù)的概念及法理基礎(chǔ) 2
二 、安全保障義務(wù)的法律性質(zhì) 2
（一）我國相關(guān)立法對經(jīng)營者安全保障義務(wù)的規(guī)定 2
（二）經(jīng)營者安全保障義務(wù)的性質(zhì) 3
三、經(jīng)營者承擔安全保障義務(wù)的合理范圍 4
（一）對經(jīng)營者利益的正視 5
（二）合理范圍的衡量標準 6
（三）經(jīng)營者安全保障義務(wù)的內(nèi)容 6
四、經(jīng)營者違反安全保障義務(wù)的責任 7
（一）歸責原則 7
（二）經(jīng)營者具體責任的承擔 8
1. 安全保障義務(wù)的責任類型 8
2. 補充賠償責任的合理性及范圍 8
結(jié) 語 10
參考文獻 11
致 謝 12
摘要
為保護消費者利益而設(shè)立的經(jīng)營者安全保障義務(wù)是一種抽象的危險注意義務(wù)，它來源于德國法官從判例中發(fā)展起來的社會活動安全注意義務(wù)理論，這一義務(wù)是強制性的，是不能約定排除和限制的法定義務(wù)。在司法實踐中審理此類案件時，我們應正視經(jīng)營者的合法利益，兼顧消費者與經(jīng)營者的利益平衡，明確經(jīng)營者對其經(jīng)營行為相關(guān)的危險源能夠合理控制，從法定標準、約定標準及理性人的標準等方面把握經(jīng)營者注意義務(wù)的合理范圍，判斷經(jīng)營者過錯（過失）及過錯大小的標準主要是經(jīng)營者是否違反法定義務(wù)、約定義務(wù)或社會生活的一般注意義務(wù)。違反安全保障義務(wù)的經(jīng)營者責任承擔方式為直接責任或補充責任兩種形式，在第三人積極侵權(quán)時，經(jīng)營者消極不作為對消費者造成損害事實，經(jīng)營者的補充賠償責任總額應小于或等于直接侵權(quán)第三人應當承擔的賠償責任的總額。
關(guān)鍵詞：安全保障義務(wù) 合理范圍 過錯 補充責任
Abstract
The operator safety control duty which sets up for the consumer protection benefit is one kind of abstract dangerous attention duty, it originates from German judge the social activity safe attention duty theory which develops from the legal precedent, this duty is compulsory, cannot agree the legal obligation which removes and limits. Tries this kind of case when the judicial practice, we should face up to operator's legal advantage, gives dual attention to the consumer and operator's benefit balance, is clear about the operator to be able to control reasonably to its management behavior related dangerous source, from official standard, agreement standard and rational person's aspects and so on standard grasps the operator to pay attention to the voluntary the reasonable scope, decided whether the operator does undertake the right infringement responsibility mistake (error) and the mistake size judgment standard is mainly an operator whether to violate the legal obligation, the agreement duty or the social life general attention duty. Violates the safety control duty the operator responsibility to undertake the way for the direct liability or the supplement responsibility two forms, when the third person infringes upon the right positively, the operator does not take negatively to the consumer creates the harm fact, operator's supplement liability o
Key Word Safety control duty ； Reasonable scope ； mistake ；supplement responsibility
參考文獻
[1]麻錦亮，張丹.論安全保障義務(wù)的性質(zhì)[J].社會科學研究，2005，（5）.
[2]張新寶，唐青林.經(jīng)營者對服務(wù)場所的安全保障義務(wù)[J].法學研究，2003，（3）.
[3]楊立新.論違反安全保障義務(wù)侵權(quán)行為及其責任[J].河南省政法管理干部學院學報，2006，（1）.
[4]宋宗宇，冉睿.論經(jīng)營者的安全保障義務(wù)——由“哭泣的上帝和尷尬的仆人”引發(fā)的法律思考[J].上海經(jīng)濟研究，2008，（1）.
[5]張新寶.侵權(quán)責任構(gòu)成要件研究[M].北京：法律出版社，2007.
[6]王澤鑒.民法學說與判例研究第二冊[M].北京：中國政法大學出版社，
