論無(wú)權(quán)代理人對(duì)相對(duì)人的責(zé)任
9599字 16頁(yè)
包括開(kāi)題報(bào)告，任務(wù)書(shū)，論文，文獻(xiàn)綜述


目錄
摘要 II
ABSTRACT III
一、問(wèn)題的提出 1
二、無(wú)權(quán)代理人對(duì)相對(duì)人承擔(dān)民事責(zé)任的根據(jù) 2
（一）無(wú)權(quán)代理人對(duì)相對(duì)人承擔(dān)民事責(zé)任根據(jù)的相關(guān)學(xué)說(shuō) 2
（二）筆者對(duì)以上學(xué)說(shuō)的評(píng)議及觀點(diǎn) 3
三、無(wú)權(quán)代理人對(duì)相對(duì)人承擔(dān)民事責(zé)任的內(nèi)容及范圍 6
（一）無(wú)權(quán)代理人對(duì)相對(duì)人承擔(dān)民事責(zé)任的內(nèi)容 6
1．學(xué)界的相關(guān)觀點(diǎn) 6
2．筆者的評(píng)析及觀點(diǎn) 6
（二）無(wú)權(quán)代理人對(duì)相對(duì)人承擔(dān)民事責(zé)任的范圍 7
1．學(xué)界的相關(guān)觀點(diǎn) 7
2．筆者的評(píng)析及觀點(diǎn) 7
四、結(jié)語(yǔ) 9
參考文獻(xiàn)： 10
致謝 11



摘要

無(wú)權(quán)代理人的民事責(zé)任是代理制度中的一個(gè)重要問(wèn)題，而我國(guó)立法對(duì)無(wú)權(quán)代理人的責(zé)任問(wèn)題規(guī)定過(guò)于概括,不利于司法實(shí)踐，故而建議在將來(lái)的民事立法中，應(yīng)具體規(guī)定相應(yīng)的無(wú)權(quán)代理人責(zé)任制度。本文在介紹和評(píng)價(jià)契約當(dāng)事人說(shuō)、侵權(quán)責(zé)任說(shuō)、締約過(guò)失責(zé)任說(shuō)、默示擔(dān)保責(zé)任說(shuō)的基礎(chǔ)上，筆者支持無(wú)權(quán)代理人對(duì)相對(duì)人的民事責(zé)任為特別責(zé)任，因?yàn)闊o(wú)權(quán)代理人與相對(duì)人之間不存在合法、有效的合同，不以無(wú)權(quán)代理人的過(guò)錯(cuò)為成立要件，也非因?yàn)闊o(wú)權(quán)代理人違反了默示擔(dān)保義務(wù)，而是因?yàn)闊o(wú)權(quán)代理人的責(zé)任由法律直接規(guī)定產(chǎn)生，應(yīng)當(dāng)是一種特別責(zé)任。同時(shí)筆者認(rèn)為無(wú)權(quán)代理人承擔(dān)的民事責(zé)任僅為賠償責(zé)任，因?yàn)槠湄?zé)任基礎(chǔ)是法定責(zé)任，他們之間不存在契約關(guān)系，無(wú)權(quán)請(qǐng)求履行合同，且以無(wú)權(quán)代理人的主觀態(tài)度來(lái)確定賠償范圍。


關(guān)鍵詞 無(wú)權(quán)代理人 民事責(zé)任 特別責(zé)任 賠償責(zé)任



Abstract

The unauthorized agent civil liability is an important issue of the agent in system, China's legislation on the responsibility of the unauthorized agents is too broad, not conducive to judicial practice, Therefore, proposals in the future of civil legislation, should specific regulate the responsibility of the corresponding unauthorized agent system. The article introducing and evaluation on the basis of contract party doctrine, tort liability doctrine , contracting fault liability doctrine, implied security responsibility doctrine. I support civil liability that the responsibility of the corresponding unauthorized agent for a special responsibility, because between the unauthorized agent and the relative does not exist the legitimate, valid contract, the unauthorized agent’s fault can not be the establishment of conditions, nor is it because they violate the implied guarantee obligations, but because the responsibility of unauthorized agent produced by the direct legal provisions, should be a special responsibility. At the same time, I believe that the unauthorized agent to assume the liability for civil liability only, Because of its responsibility is based on the statutory responsibility, There is no contract between them, have no right to request performance of the contract, and use subjective approach of the unauthorized agents to determine the compensation.


Key word: The unauthorized agent; Civil Liability; Special responsibility; The responsibility of compensation



參考文獻(xiàn)
[1]孔祥俊．民商法熱點(diǎn)、難點(diǎn)及前沿問(wèn)題[M]．北京：人民法院出版社，2008．
[2]梁慧星．英美代理法研究[M]．北京：法律出版社，2009.
[3]柳經(jīng)緯．民法總論（二版）[M]．廈門(mén)：夏門(mén)大學(xué)出版社，2007.
[4]梁慧星．民商法論叢（ 第十卷）[M]．北京：法律出版社，1998.
[5]謝邦宇．現(xiàn)代民法總論[M]．湖南：湖南師范大學(xué)出版社，1995.
[6]李永軍．合同法（第二版）[M]．北京：法律出版社，2006.
[7]王利明．民法[M]．北京：中國(guó)人民大學(xué)出版社，2000.
[8]張新寶．侵權(quán)責(zé)任構(gòu)成要件研究[M]．北京：法律出版社，2000.
[9]魏振瀛．民法[M]．北京：北京大學(xué)出版社、高等教育出版社，2000.
[10]史尚寬．債法總論[M]．北京：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)出版社，2008.
[11]高富平．代理概念及立法的比較研究[J]．比較法研究，1997，2．
[12]史浩明．論表見(jiàn)代理[J]．法律科學(xué)，1995，1.
[13]張新寶．代理權(quán)問(wèn)題若干問(wèn)題探討[J]．法學(xué)研究，1987，6.
[14]凌艷傳．論狹義物權(quán)代理人對(duì)于相對(duì)人的責(zé)任[J]．政法學(xué)刊，1992，2.
[15]王利明等．民法新論(上)[M]．北京：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)出版社，1988.
[16]高富平．代理概念及立法的比較研究[J]．比較法研究，1997，2.