外商直接投資對(duì)我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的貢獻(xiàn)評(píng)價(jià)
The Contribution of Inward Foreign Direct Investment
to China’s Economic Growth

全文12頁(yè) 約11000字 論述翔實(shí)

【摘 要】本文運(yùn)用擴(kuò)展的新古典增長(zhǎng)理論模型、把資本存量中外商直接投資部分分離出來(lái)的方法，對(duì)我國(guó)80年代中后期以來(lái)外商直接投資的表現(xiàn)以及對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的貢獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行了經(jīng)驗(yàn)分析。結(jié)果表明：“資本”形態(tài)的外商直接投資的表現(xiàn)要優(yōu)于國(guó)內(nèi)投資，但外資在“量”上增加的優(yōu)勢(shì)在逐漸減弱，吸引外資更應(yīng)以“質(zhì)”為導(dǎo)向。另外，“資本”形態(tài)的外商直接投資對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的貢獻(xiàn)率為5%，外商直接投資仍有很大發(fā)展?jié)摿?，尤其是在第一、三產(chǎn)業(yè)。
【關(guān)鍵詞】外商直接投資,國(guó)內(nèi)投資,經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)

[Abstract] This paper develops an augmented neo-classical growth model under China’s experience, which separates the FDI form the total capital input. The empirical study shows that “physical” FDI has been performing better than “physical” domestic investment since post of 1980s. Whereas, the advantage of scale-measured FDI over domestic investment has disappeared by time, so policies oriented to attract FDI should change from “quantity” to “quality” criterion. The study also shows that “physical” FDI has contributed about 5 percent of China’s economic growth, and there are great potential for FDI development, especially in the first and third industries.
[Key words] foreign direct investment, domestic investment, economic growth

參考文獻(xiàn)
[1] 國(guó)家統(tǒng)計(jì)局. 中國(guó)統(tǒng)計(jì)年鑒[M]. 北京: 中國(guó)統(tǒng)計(jì)出版社, 1985~2000.
[2] 中國(guó)對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易年鑒編輯委員會(huì). 中國(guó)對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易年鑒[M]. 北京: 中國(guó)對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易出版社, 1985~2000.
[3] FAN Xiaoqin, DICKIE Paul M. The Contribution of Foreign Direct Investment to Growth and Stability-A Post-Crisis ASEAN-5 Review [J]. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 2000, 17(3): 312-23.
[4] LUIZ R, DE MELLO Jr. Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries and Growth: A Selective Survey [J]. The Journal of Development Studies, 1997, 34(1): 1-34.
[5] ZHANG Qing, FELMINGHAM Bruce. The Relationship between Inward Direct Foreign Investment and China’s Provincial Export Trade [J]. China Economic Review, 2000, 12: 82-99.
[6] The World Bank. Global Development Finance 2000 [J], The World Bank, 2000, 1: 119-39.