論貪污罪的司法適用.rar
論貪污罪的司法適用,1.6萬字 21頁包括開題報告,任務(wù)書,論文,文獻(xiàn)綜述,課題申報審批表,周進(jìn)展記錄表,中期檢查表等完整畢業(yè)資料!目 錄摘要ⅡabstractⅢ前言 1 一、關(guān)于貪污罪概念的界定1(一)貪污罪概念定義1(二)對貪污罪的概念定義的評析 1二、貪污罪的犯罪對象的司法認(rèn)定 2(一)對國家參股或國有公司、企業(yè)參...
該文檔為壓縮文件,包含的文件列表如下:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05190/05190677f8737516af6ab12ecf7bb4b863a7240f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8db9a/8db9a2431b97dabe99820239eb7f952521342258" alt=""
內(nèi)容介紹
原文檔由會員 lyy1314 發(fā)布
論貪污罪的司法適用
1.6萬字 21頁
包括開題報告,任務(wù)書,論文,文獻(xiàn)綜述,課題申報審批表,周進(jìn)展記錄表,中期檢查表等完整畢業(yè)資料!
目 錄
摘要………………………………………………………………………… Ⅱ
ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………… Ⅲ
前言………………………………………………………………………… 1
一、關(guān)于貪污罪概念的界定……………………………………… 1
(一)貪污罪概念定義…………………………………………………… 1
(二)對貪污罪的概念定義的評析……………………………………… 1
二、貪污罪的犯罪對象的司法認(rèn)定……………………………… 2
(一)對國家參股或國有公司、企業(yè)參股的公司財物的認(rèn)定…… 2
(二)純私有財產(chǎn)可否視為貪污罪的犯罪對象……………………… 4
三、貪污罪客觀方面的司法認(rèn)定…………………………………… 6
(一).利用職務(wù)之便……………………………………………………… 6
(二).關(guān)于共犯的司法認(rèn)定……………………………………………… 7
四、貪污罪主體的司法認(rèn)定…………………………………………… 9
(一)國有性質(zhì)的認(rèn)定……………………………………………………… 9
(二)關(guān)于委派的認(rèn)定………………………………………………… 11
(三)關(guān)于從事公務(wù)的認(rèn)定……………………………………………… 13
五、結(jié)論…………………………………………………………………… 14
參考文獻(xiàn)…………………………………………………………………… 15
致謝………………………………………………………………………… 16
摘要
貪污罪作為一種嚴(yán)重的職務(wù)犯罪行為,歷年來是國家統(tǒng)治階級為了協(xié)調(diào)統(tǒng)治關(guān)系,維護(hù)階級統(tǒng)治予以打擊的重點犯罪。今年是改革開放30周年,隨著改革的繼續(xù)深入,市場經(jīng)濟(jì)體制的進(jìn)一步發(fā)展,社會生活發(fā)生了翻天覆地的變化,實踐中出現(xiàn)多種新的貪污行為,給司法部門帶來了新的難題,在理論界引起了不少爭議,因此刑法學(xué)界對此進(jìn)行了大量的研究。
關(guān)于犯罪對象的爭論主要集中在對國家參股或國有公司、企業(yè)參股的公司財物的認(rèn)定。有的認(rèn)為應(yīng)該肯定其國有性質(zhì),有的則完全否定其國有性質(zhì)。筆者認(rèn)為肯定說有一定的合理性,應(yīng)當(dāng)堅持公有資本存在說。對私有財產(chǎn)的認(rèn)定,有的學(xué)者完全否認(rèn)其作為貪污罪的犯罪對象。而筆者則認(rèn)為根據(jù)我國刑法的相關(guān)規(guī)定我們不應(yīng)當(dāng)把私有財產(chǎn)完全排除在外。對于“利用職務(wù)之便”,筆者認(rèn)為,要弄清貪污罪中利用職務(wù)上的便利的真正含義,除從立法本身出發(fā)去追尋其立法原旨外,更重要的是以相關(guān)的司法解釋為依據(jù)。因此筆者認(rèn)為貪污罪中的職務(wù)上的便利就是指行為人職務(wù)上的處理、處分或者控制公共財物職務(wù)行為的便利。關(guān)于共犯,筆者認(rèn)為,對混合主體的共同貪污行為的定性應(yīng)當(dāng)考慮到其特殊性,還要兼顧我國現(xiàn)行刑法的特殊規(guī)定,即應(yīng)當(dāng)將“共同犯罪性質(zhì)說”與“利用職務(wù)便利決定說”兩者結(jié)合起來。關(guān)于主體的認(rèn)定特別是國有性質(zhì)理論上有參股說、獨資說、控股說之爭,筆者認(rèn)為相比較而言獨資說更合理些。筆者結(jié)合實際情況,根據(jù)我國刑法規(guī)定,對貪污罪的概念、犯罪對象、犯罪客觀方面等一系列疑難問題進(jìn)行探討研究,提出對這些問題的個人看法,以期能解決司法實踐中對貪污罪若干情況的適用問題。
關(guān)鍵詞:貪污, 利用職務(wù)之便, 國家工作人員, 公共財物
The applicable of justice about the crime of corruption
Abstract
The crime of corruption is one kind of serious crime by taking advantage of duty behavior, over the years is the country ruling class to coordinate the relations of the rules , is a key crime which the class of rules attack. This year is the reform and open policy 30th anniversary, continues thoroughly along with the reform, market economy system's further development, social life had the earth-shaking change, in the practice there are many kinds of new corruptions, wich has brought the new difficult problem for the Judicial department, and has caused many disputes in the theorists.
The controversy of the crime target mainly concentrated in the state shares or state-owned companies, enterprises, the shares of companies that property. Some believe that the state should recognize its nature, while others are completely deny its state-owned properties. I think that certainly has some reasonable ,we should insist that public capital. On private property that, Some scholars completely denied the criminal offence of corruption as a target. And I think , according to the relevant provisions of China's Criminal Law , we should not be excluded completely private property. For "used his position to", in my view, to understand the true meaning of the crime of corruption in the use of his position to facilitate, we shoud make a use of the relevant judicial interpretation as the basis. Therefore, I believe that the crime of corruption in his position to facilitate ,wich the perpetrator positions on the treatment, and disposal of public property or control functions of convenience. About an accomplice, in my view,we shoud take into account its special nature,about the common characterization of acts of corruption of mixed main.we shoud Combine"Common criminal nature" and " decision about used his position to facilitate " together. On the subject of that,there are Shares, owned, and holding ,but comparatively speaking, I believe that a more reasonable that owned more.
The author unifies the actual situation, according to our country criminal law, conducts the discussion research to the crime of corruption main body and the crime object and so on , proposed that individual views to these questions, by the time can solve the applicable of justice about the crime of corruption in the judicial practice .
Key Words:Crime of corruption , Used his position to, public property, Country staff ,
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1] 董邦俊.貪污罪新論[M].北京:中國方正出版社,2004.
[2] 何秉松.職務(wù)犯罪的預(yù)防與懲治[M].北京:中國方正出版社,1999.
[3] 高銘暄.新編中國刑法學(xué)(下冊)[M].北京:人民大學(xué)出版社, 1998.
[4] 趙秉志.新刑法教程.[M]. 北京:人民大學(xué)出版社,1998.
[5] 高銘暄,馬克昌.刑法學(xué).[M].北京:北京大學(xué)出版社 ,高等教育出版社,2007.
[6] 高銘暄.刑法學(xué)原理 第一卷.[M].北京: 人民大學(xué)出版社,1993.
[7] 董邦俊.貪污罪新論[M].北京:中國方正出版社,2004.
[10] 最高人民法院法釋[2001]第17號.
[11] 賈于宇, 舒洪水.論刑法中“國有公司”及“受委派從事公務(wù)的人員”之認(rèn)定[J].法學(xué)評論,2002年第3期.
[12] 劉憲權(quán).中國刑法理論前沿問題研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2005.
[13] 阮方民.國家工作人員概念若干問題辨析.[J].浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社科版),2002年第2期
[14] 彭浩.關(guān)于刑法中國家工作人員的辨析.[J].江西公安??茖W(xué)校學(xué)報,2001年第2期
[15] 龔培華.貪污罪立法模式及司法認(rèn)定.[J].政治與法律,2001年第2期
[16] 顏娟.貪污罪的共同犯罪問題研究[J].吉林公安高等??茖W(xué)校學(xué)報,2002年8月第4期
[17] 肖中華.也論貪污罪的“利用職務(wù)上的便利” [J].法學(xué),2006年第7期
[18] 劉家琛.刑法分則及配套規(guī)定新解[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2000.
[19] 王季君.貪污賄賂罪[M].北京:法律出版社,1999.
1.6萬字 21頁
包括開題報告,任務(wù)書,論文,文獻(xiàn)綜述,課題申報審批表,周進(jìn)展記錄表,中期檢查表等完整畢業(yè)資料!
目 錄
摘要………………………………………………………………………… Ⅱ
ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………… Ⅲ
前言………………………………………………………………………… 1
一、關(guān)于貪污罪概念的界定……………………………………… 1
(一)貪污罪概念定義…………………………………………………… 1
(二)對貪污罪的概念定義的評析……………………………………… 1
二、貪污罪的犯罪對象的司法認(rèn)定……………………………… 2
(一)對國家參股或國有公司、企業(yè)參股的公司財物的認(rèn)定…… 2
(二)純私有財產(chǎn)可否視為貪污罪的犯罪對象……………………… 4
三、貪污罪客觀方面的司法認(rèn)定…………………………………… 6
(一).利用職務(wù)之便……………………………………………………… 6
(二).關(guān)于共犯的司法認(rèn)定……………………………………………… 7
四、貪污罪主體的司法認(rèn)定…………………………………………… 9
(一)國有性質(zhì)的認(rèn)定……………………………………………………… 9
(二)關(guān)于委派的認(rèn)定………………………………………………… 11
(三)關(guān)于從事公務(wù)的認(rèn)定……………………………………………… 13
五、結(jié)論…………………………………………………………………… 14
參考文獻(xiàn)…………………………………………………………………… 15
致謝………………………………………………………………………… 16
摘要
貪污罪作為一種嚴(yán)重的職務(wù)犯罪行為,歷年來是國家統(tǒng)治階級為了協(xié)調(diào)統(tǒng)治關(guān)系,維護(hù)階級統(tǒng)治予以打擊的重點犯罪。今年是改革開放30周年,隨著改革的繼續(xù)深入,市場經(jīng)濟(jì)體制的進(jìn)一步發(fā)展,社會生活發(fā)生了翻天覆地的變化,實踐中出現(xiàn)多種新的貪污行為,給司法部門帶來了新的難題,在理論界引起了不少爭議,因此刑法學(xué)界對此進(jìn)行了大量的研究。
關(guān)于犯罪對象的爭論主要集中在對國家參股或國有公司、企業(yè)參股的公司財物的認(rèn)定。有的認(rèn)為應(yīng)該肯定其國有性質(zhì),有的則完全否定其國有性質(zhì)。筆者認(rèn)為肯定說有一定的合理性,應(yīng)當(dāng)堅持公有資本存在說。對私有財產(chǎn)的認(rèn)定,有的學(xué)者完全否認(rèn)其作為貪污罪的犯罪對象。而筆者則認(rèn)為根據(jù)我國刑法的相關(guān)規(guī)定我們不應(yīng)當(dāng)把私有財產(chǎn)完全排除在外。對于“利用職務(wù)之便”,筆者認(rèn)為,要弄清貪污罪中利用職務(wù)上的便利的真正含義,除從立法本身出發(fā)去追尋其立法原旨外,更重要的是以相關(guān)的司法解釋為依據(jù)。因此筆者認(rèn)為貪污罪中的職務(wù)上的便利就是指行為人職務(wù)上的處理、處分或者控制公共財物職務(wù)行為的便利。關(guān)于共犯,筆者認(rèn)為,對混合主體的共同貪污行為的定性應(yīng)當(dāng)考慮到其特殊性,還要兼顧我國現(xiàn)行刑法的特殊規(guī)定,即應(yīng)當(dāng)將“共同犯罪性質(zhì)說”與“利用職務(wù)便利決定說”兩者結(jié)合起來。關(guān)于主體的認(rèn)定特別是國有性質(zhì)理論上有參股說、獨資說、控股說之爭,筆者認(rèn)為相比較而言獨資說更合理些。筆者結(jié)合實際情況,根據(jù)我國刑法規(guī)定,對貪污罪的概念、犯罪對象、犯罪客觀方面等一系列疑難問題進(jìn)行探討研究,提出對這些問題的個人看法,以期能解決司法實踐中對貪污罪若干情況的適用問題。
關(guān)鍵詞:貪污, 利用職務(wù)之便, 國家工作人員, 公共財物
The applicable of justice about the crime of corruption
Abstract
The crime of corruption is one kind of serious crime by taking advantage of duty behavior, over the years is the country ruling class to coordinate the relations of the rules , is a key crime which the class of rules attack. This year is the reform and open policy 30th anniversary, continues thoroughly along with the reform, market economy system's further development, social life had the earth-shaking change, in the practice there are many kinds of new corruptions, wich has brought the new difficult problem for the Judicial department, and has caused many disputes in the theorists.
The controversy of the crime target mainly concentrated in the state shares or state-owned companies, enterprises, the shares of companies that property. Some believe that the state should recognize its nature, while others are completely deny its state-owned properties. I think that certainly has some reasonable ,we should insist that public capital. On private property that, Some scholars completely denied the criminal offence of corruption as a target. And I think , according to the relevant provisions of China's Criminal Law , we should not be excluded completely private property. For "used his position to", in my view, to understand the true meaning of the crime of corruption in the use of his position to facilitate, we shoud make a use of the relevant judicial interpretation as the basis. Therefore, I believe that the crime of corruption in his position to facilitate ,wich the perpetrator positions on the treatment, and disposal of public property or control functions of convenience. About an accomplice, in my view,we shoud take into account its special nature,about the common characterization of acts of corruption of mixed main.we shoud Combine"Common criminal nature" and " decision about used his position to facilitate " together. On the subject of that,there are Shares, owned, and holding ,but comparatively speaking, I believe that a more reasonable that owned more.
The author unifies the actual situation, according to our country criminal law, conducts the discussion research to the crime of corruption main body and the crime object and so on , proposed that individual views to these questions, by the time can solve the applicable of justice about the crime of corruption in the judicial practice .
Key Words:Crime of corruption , Used his position to, public property, Country staff ,
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1] 董邦俊.貪污罪新論[M].北京:中國方正出版社,2004.
[2] 何秉松.職務(wù)犯罪的預(yù)防與懲治[M].北京:中國方正出版社,1999.
[3] 高銘暄.新編中國刑法學(xué)(下冊)[M].北京:人民大學(xué)出版社, 1998.
[4] 趙秉志.新刑法教程.[M]. 北京:人民大學(xué)出版社,1998.
[5] 高銘暄,馬克昌.刑法學(xué).[M].北京:北京大學(xué)出版社 ,高等教育出版社,2007.
[6] 高銘暄.刑法學(xué)原理 第一卷.[M].北京: 人民大學(xué)出版社,1993.
[7] 董邦俊.貪污罪新論[M].北京:中國方正出版社,2004.
[10] 最高人民法院法釋[2001]第17號.
[11] 賈于宇, 舒洪水.論刑法中“國有公司”及“受委派從事公務(wù)的人員”之認(rèn)定[J].法學(xué)評論,2002年第3期.
[12] 劉憲權(quán).中國刑法理論前沿問題研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2005.
[13] 阮方民.國家工作人員概念若干問題辨析.[J].浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社科版),2002年第2期
[14] 彭浩.關(guān)于刑法中國家工作人員的辨析.[J].江西公安??茖W(xué)校學(xué)報,2001年第2期
[15] 龔培華.貪污罪立法模式及司法認(rèn)定.[J].政治與法律,2001年第2期
[16] 顏娟.貪污罪的共同犯罪問題研究[J].吉林公安高等??茖W(xué)校學(xué)報,2002年8月第4期
[17] 肖中華.也論貪污罪的“利用職務(wù)上的便利” [J].法學(xué),2006年第7期
[18] 劉家琛.刑法分則及配套規(guī)定新解[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2000.
[19] 王季君.貪污賄賂罪[M].北京:法律出版社,1999.