刑事訴訟非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則淺析
正文1.26萬(wàn)字 17頁(yè)

包括開(kāi)題報(bào)告，任務(wù)書(shū)，論文，文獻(xiàn)綜述，課題申報(bào)審批表，周進(jìn)展記錄表等全套完整畢業(yè)資料！


目錄
摘要……………………………………………………Ⅲ
Abstract………………………………………………Ⅳ
引言…………………………………………………… 1
一、 國(guó)外刑事訴訟非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則之立法模式及借鑒…… 2
（一）美國(guó)非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的立法模式………………………… 2
1．美國(guó)非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的立法模式………………………………………… 2
2．美國(guó)非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則價(jià)值理念…………………………………………….. 2
（1）威懾警察的非法行為和保護(hù)人權(quán)………………………………………… 2
（2）強(qiáng)調(diào)程序正當(dāng)性和司法正直……………………………………………… 3
（二）英國(guó)非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的立法模式………………………… 4
（三）英、美兩國(guó)非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則對(duì)我國(guó)的借鑒意義………… 4
二、我國(guó)非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則存在的問(wèn)題…………………………… 6
（一）我國(guó)非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則概述………………………………… 6
1．非法證據(jù)之概念……………………………………………………………… 6
2．非法證據(jù)的界定……………………………………………………………. 6
(1)廣義非法證據(jù)………………………………………………………………… 6
(2)狹義非法證據(jù)………………………………………………………………… 6
（二）我國(guó)非法證據(jù)的排除存在的問(wèn)題…………………………… 7
1.我國(guó)現(xiàn)行有關(guān)排除非法證據(jù)的法律規(guī)定……………………………………… 7
2.我國(guó)非法證據(jù)存在的問(wèn)題及分析……………………………………………… 8
三、完善我國(guó)非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的若干建議……………………11
結(jié)論……………………………………………………………… 15
參考文獻(xiàn)………………………………………………………… 16
致謝詞…………………………………………………………… 17



摘要
非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則是當(dāng)今世界各國(guó)普遍認(rèn)同的一項(xiàng)證據(jù)規(guī)則，它能夠很好的平衡打擊犯罪和保護(hù)公民基本權(quán)利之間產(chǎn)生的沖突。非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的設(shè)立是一個(gè)國(guó)家基于對(duì)它自身的主導(dǎo)價(jià)值觀念和對(duì)公民權(quán)利的重視程度體現(xiàn)，然而各個(gè)國(guó)家的主導(dǎo)價(jià)值觀念和對(duì)公民權(quán)利的重視程度有所不同，所以關(guān)于非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則，各國(guó)的立法時(shí)價(jià)值取舍就有所差別。從世界范圍來(lái)看，主要有兩種模式：一是強(qiáng)制排除模式，多見(jiàn)于美國(guó)；另一個(gè)是裁量模式，多見(jiàn)于英國(guó)。我國(guó)也面臨著非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則價(jià)值取舍的問(wèn)題，這是我國(guó)設(shè)立和完善相關(guān)制度的根本。但是非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則在國(guó)外已有比較成熟的制度體系，而在我國(guó)卻依然處于理論探索階段。因此，通過(guò)對(duì)國(guó)外非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則模式價(jià)值取舍的研究，汲取其中精華價(jià)值理念，從適合我國(guó)國(guó)情的角度來(lái)完善我國(guó)相關(guān)規(guī)則。

關(guān)鍵詞：非法證據(jù) 排除規(guī)則 立法現(xiàn)狀 完善建議



Discussing criminal litigation procedures-The Illegal Evidence eliminating Rules
Summary
The lllegal Eivdence eliminating Rules is one of the witness regulations, which is accepted by every countries around the world at large.it is able to well balance the conflicts between crime flighting and citizen basic rights protection.The establishment of The IIIegal eividece eliminating Rules is based on a country's own dominant values conception and itsembodiment of the significance of civil rights. However these two factors vary in different countries,therefore concerning The Rules for The IIIlegal Evidence eliminating,different countries could make one's choice on dissimilar value during their act of legislating.From a global perspective,there are mainly two models:First of all, it is the mandatory eliminating model,which is mostly used in the United States and Second of all, it is the dscretionary model, which is mostly used by the Untied Kingdom.China also faced the problem with The IIIegal Evidence eliminating Rules's value choosing,this is the fundamentality for China to establish and consummate the interrelated system.Although The IIIegal Evidence eliminating Rules has already had a comparatively mature system overseas,China is still on the phase of theoretical exploration.Hence by studying foreign choices on pattern value for The IIIegal Evidence eliminating Rules and adopting the best value concept among them, to perfect our country's relevant rules from the point of view of fitting China's national conditions.


Key words: the illegal evidence, the eliminating rule, the present situation of legislation, the consummating suggestion



參考文獻(xiàn)
[1] 郭志媛.刑事證據(jù)可采性研究[M].北京：中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)出版社，2004.
[2] 錢(qián)育之. 對(duì)我國(guó).非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則立法的思考[J].經(jīng)濟(jì)與法，2006，9.
[3]Stephen C.Thaman.Conmparative Criminal Procedure—A Casebook Approach[M].Carolina Academic Press.2002.
[4] 王京建.論構(gòu)建我國(guó)刑事訴訟非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則[J].江南社會(huì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)，2006，8（4）.
[5] 陳立.刑事證據(jù)法專(zhuān)論[M].廈門(mén)大學(xué)出版社，2006.
[6] 宋英輝，湯維建.證據(jù)法學(xué)研究述評(píng)[M].北京： 中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)出版社，2006.
[7] 楊宇冠.非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則[M].北京：中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)出版社，2003.
[8] 柴發(fā)邦.訴訟大辭典[M].成都：四川人民出版社，1983.55.
[9] 徐曉玲，胡日亮.試析我國(guó)非法證據(jù)排除問(wèn)題[J].江西社會(huì)科學(xué)，2006，12.
[10] 邵軍鋒.刑事非法證據(jù)取舍與法律價(jià)值的選擇[J].濟(jì)南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)，2005，15（6）.
[11] 孫彩虹. 刑事非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則探析[J].首都師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)（社會(huì)科學(xué)版），2006.
[12] 包斯琴. 論刑事非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的模式選擇及構(gòu)建[J].前沿，2006，12.
[13] 樊崇義.證據(jù)法學(xué)[M].北京：法律出版社，2003.
[14] 李心鑒.刑事訴訟構(gòu)造論[M].北京：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)出版社，1992.
[15] 龍宗智、李玉華.論我國(guó)刑事訴訟證據(jù)規(guī)則[J].南京大學(xué)法律評(píng)論，1997.
[16] 楊燮蛟. 簡(jiǎn)述美、英、歐盟刑事訴訟中的非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則[J].江西公安專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào),2003,11(6).
[17] 曹堅(jiān).刑事非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的價(jià)值基礎(chǔ)及其本土化構(gòu)建[J].中國(guó)刑事法雜志.2002,5(7).